Overview
- Eliminate false positives and focus on real threats with findings that are only reported after controlled, non-destructive exploit validation.
- Scale security assessments to enterprise levels using thousands of parallel AI agents that creatively explore and attack web applications autonomously.
- Integrate testing into any workflow by launching comprehensive penetration tests manually or via API with defined scope, targets, and authentication.
- Maintain testing depth and human-like reasoning with autonomous agents that plan attack paths and adapt based on live application responses.
- Access a full offensive toolkit through a shared execution environment that provides industry-standard and custom-built security tools to every AI agent.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Comprehensive web app penetration tests
- Reduces false positives
- Autonomous exploitation confirmation
- Can be manually initiated
- API integration for assessments
- Autonomous mapping of applications
- Entry points identification
- Attack paths planning
- Parallel attacks by agents
- Adapts based on app responses
- Uses real offensive security tools
- Large scale and focused attacks
- Human-like reasoning in attacks
- Access to industry-standard tools
- Uses custom-built security tools
- Validated results for customer reporting
- Deterministic validators
- Real-time reporting of findings
- Advanced false-positive reduction
- Platform intelligence promotion
- Set targets, boundaries, authentication
- Optional context for testing guide
- Maintains depth, scale, trust
- Non-destructive challenges for validation
- Persistent orchestration and decision engine
- Fresh context for agents
- Steerable headless browser
- Collaboration services for safe validation
- High confidence, clear evidence
- Developer-ready remediation
- Finds unknown vulnerabilities
- Focused agents for accuracy
- Creative discovery and verification separation
- Proven explotability with reproducible exploit
- Non-destructive validation for production
- Observable, constrained autonomous activities
- Streaming options for compliance
- Real, exploitable risk surfacing
Cons
- Doesn't provide immediate results
- Lack of mobile application testing
- Requires manual input for scope
- Doesn't offer historical data comparison
- No multi-language support
- Doesn't support all authentication types
- Only web application penetration testing
- No performance or load tests
- Lack of real-time vulnerability alerts
- Requires API for automation
Reviews
Rate this tool
Loading reviews...
Pricing
Pricing model
Paid
Paid options from
$4,000
Billing frequency
One-time
