Overview

- Access 100+ AI models through a single integration by changing only your base URL, eliminating the need to manage multiple provider accounts.
- Keep AI applications running without interruption through automatic failover that reroutes requests to healthy providers during upstream outages.
- Control AI spending with transparent per-token pricing that shows exact costs for every request, avoiding surprise bills.
- Monitor AI performance in real time with a live dashboard tracking token usage, latency, and model health to optimize operations.
- Share AI credits across team members while maintaining control with per-key limits and usage logs for accountability.
- Build versatile AI solutions from coding agents to production apps using a platform compatible with Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, and OpenClaw.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Native integration to APIs
- Routs requests to 100+ models
- Transparent per-token pricing
- Automatic failover support
- Compatible with various tools
- Live token usage monitoring
- Latency monitoring
- Model health tracking
- Per-key limits
- Per-key usage logs
- Prevents provider dependence
- Supports diverse applications
- Allows model comparison
- Supports credits sharing
- 15% off model pricing
- One key for all models
- Upstream provider degradation handling
- Flexible pricing
- Works with Claude Code
- Works with Codex CLI
- Works with OpenCode
- Works with Pi
- Works with Hermes
- Works with OpenClaw
- Ecosystem-friendly
- One API key for all
- No subscription
- No code rewrite
- API key compatibility across models
- Connected with major model makers
- Transparent pricing
- Native tool integration
- Live usage insight
- Supports production apps & agents
- Help in prototypes & side projects
- Facilitates model evaluation
- Allows small team collaboration
- Avoids single-vendor lock-in
- Routs requests to healthy paths
- No extra instrumentation needed
- Cheaper tokens
- Allows model swap per request
- Avoids provider account juggling
- Reduces token bill by 15%
Cons
- Per-token pricing can be expensive
- Limited to specified API integrations
- Dependent on external API providers
- No direct provider contact
- No subscription option
- Limited to listed coding tools
- Doesn't mention offline capabilities
- Dependence on healthy paths
- Single point of failure
Reviews
Rate this tool
Loading reviews...
Pricing
Pricing model
Paid
Paid options from
$10/unit
Billing frequency
Pay-as-you-go









